At a glance
- Nature
- Angiographically occult low-flow vascular malformation
- Familial genes
- CCM1 (KRIT1), CCM2, CCM3 (PDCD10)
- Key MRI feature
- “Popcorn” core with a haemosiderin rim; SWI shows more lesions
- Highest bleeding risk
- Brainstem location and a prior haemorrhage
- Associated finding
- Developmental venous anomaly (DVA), often adjacent
Overview and pathogenesis
Cavernous malformations (cavernomas, cavernous angiomas) are clusters of dilated, endothelium-lined caverns without intervening brain parenchyma. They are low-pressure lesions that enlarge through repeated small haemorrhages, thrombosis and organisation, which produces the characteristic layered blood products. Lesions occur sporadically, often next to a developmental venous anomaly, or in a familial form caused by loss-of-function mutations in CCM1 (KRIT1), CCM2 or CCM3 (PDCD10), in which multiple lesions develop and new ones appear over time[1]. Cranial radiotherapy is a recognised cause of de novo lesions.
Natural history
An individual patient data meta-analysis of untreated cavernomas found that the strongest predictors of a future symptomatic haemorrhage are a prior haemorrhage at presentation and brainstem location[2]. Patients with neither had a low five-year risk, whereas brainstem lesions that had already bled carried a five-year risk of roughly one in three. Re-haemorrhage risk is highest in the first years after a bleed and declines afterwards (temporal clustering), which matters when interpreting surgical series.
The Zabramski MRI classification, developed in a prospective familial cohort, describes lesions by their blood products: type I subacute haemorrhage, type II the classic mixed-signal “popcorn” lesion, type III chronic haemorrhage, and type IV punctate lesions visible only on gradient-echo imaging[3].
Clinical presentation
Supratentorial lesions most often present with seizures, followed by headache and focal deficits. Brainstem and deep (thalamic, basal ganglia) lesions present with acute or stepwise cranial-nerve and long-tract deficits after haemorrhage, frequently with partial recovery between events. Many lesions are found incidentally.
Imaging and work-up
MRI is diagnostic: a reticulated core of mixed signal with a complete T2-hypointense haemosiderin rim, and blooming on gradient-echo or susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI). SWI also reveals additional small lesions that suggest the familial form. Catheter angiography is normal and is not needed unless another vascular lesion is suspected; contrast-enhanced MRI shows any associated DVA, which must be preserved at surgery. Genetic counselling and testing are recommended for patients with multiple lesions or a family history[1]. For epilepsy surgery, EEG and seizure semiology are correlated with the lesion.
Surgical decision-making
Consensus guidelines support resection for accessible lesions causing epilepsy (especially drug-resistant seizures) and for symptomatic lesions that have bled when the surgical risk is acceptable; asymptomatic lesions and those in eloquent, deep locations without a surface presentation are usually observed[1]. For brainstem cavernomas, surgery is generally offered after a second symptomatic haemorrhage, or after a single haemorrhage with significant deficit, when the lesion abuts the pial or ependymal surface. Timing in the subacute window, after the haematoma has begun to liquefy but before dense gliosis forms, eases dissection.
The Lawton–Garcia grading system for brainstem cavernomas predicts outcome from lesion size, crossing of the axial midpoint, an associated DVA, patient age and the timing of surgery after the last haemorrhage[4]. Stereotactic radiosurgery has a limited and debated role, mostly for high-risk deep lesions that cannot be resected.
Operative technique and nuances
- Use neuronavigation, and for brainstem lesions neurophysiological monitoring (motor and somatosensory evoked potentials, cranial-nerve and corticobulbar monitoring).
- Choose the approach so that the lesion is reached where it comes closest to the surface (the two-point method), and enter the brainstem through an anatomically defined safe entry zone if it does not reach the surface[5].
- Debulk the lesion from inside and then dissect it from the surrounding gliotic plane with minimal traction; avoid bipolar coagulation on the brainstem floor.
- Preserve any developmental venous anomaly; sacrificing it risks venous infarction.
- For epilepsy, removal of the haemosiderin-stained cortex improves seizure outcome in non-eloquent cortex; in the brainstem the rim is left.
Complications and outcomes
After supratentorial resection most patients achieve good seizure control, particularly when surgery is performed early in the course of epilepsy. Brainstem surgery carries a substantial risk of new or worsened deficits immediately after surgery, many of which improve; long-term outcome is related to the preoperative status and the Lawton–Garcia grade[4]. Residual cavernoma carries a high risk of further haemorrhage, so complete removal is the goal whenever surgery is undertaken.
Take-home
Surgical pearls
- Ask about family history and look at SWI; multiple lesions mean genetic counselling.
- Prior haemorrhage and brainstem location dominate the risk of future bleeding.
- Never sacrifice the associated developmental venous anomaly.
- In the brainstem, operate where the lesion comes to the surface, or through a safe entry zone, and remove it completely.
Related
References
- 1.Akers A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Awad IA, et al. Synopsis of guidelines for the clinical management of cerebral cavernous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):665-680.
- 2.Horne MA, Flemming KD, Su IC, et al. Clinical course of untreated cerebral cavernous malformations: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(2):166-173.
- 3.Zabramski JM, Wascher TM, Spetzler RF, et al. The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: results of an ongoing study. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(3):422-432.
- 4.Garcia RM, Ivan ME, Lawton MT. Brainstem cavernous malformations: surgical results in 104 patients and a proposed grading system to predict neurological outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(3):265-278.
- 5.Cavalcanti DD, Preul MC, Kalani MY, Spetzler RF. Microsurgical anatomy of safe entry zones to the brainstem. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(5):1359-1376.
General education for medical professionals. It summarises published literature and is not advice for any individual patient or a substitute for supervised surgical training.